Other FIT Wellington pages:
Show minor edits - Show changes to markup
Promote a more liveable Wellington city, responsive to climate change, to be achieved by reducing reliance on the private car.
Promote a more liveable Wellington city, responsive to climate change, by reducing reliance on the private car.
Transport behaviour and provision worldwide are changing rapidly in the face of climate change, emission-reduction targets, new technology, and new mobility arrangements.
With mobility increasingly becoming a service, LGWM must not lock us into a private-vehicle–dominated model of transport provision that is already becoming obsolete.
Transport behaviour and provision worldwide are changing rapidly in the face of emission-reduction targets, new technology, and new mobility arrangements.
With mobility increasingly becoming a service, LGWM must not lock us into a private-vehicle–dominated model of transport provision that is already becoming obsolete.
Promote a more liveable Wellington city, to be achieved by reducing reliance on the private car.
Promote a more liveable Wellington city that is responsive to climate change risks, to be achieved by reducing reliance on the private car.
Transport behaviour and provision worldwide are changing rapidly in the face of climate change, emission-reduction targets, new technology, and new mobility arrangements.
Transport behaviour and provision worldwide are changing rapidly in the face of climate change, emission-reduction targets, new technology, and new mobility arrangements.
We support the objectives of the LGWM project1 in an open and transparent process.
We support the objectives of the LGWM project2 in an open and transparent process.
We see cities geared to public and active transport have less congestion than cities geared for private cars.
Transport behaviour and provision worldwide are changing rapidly in the face of new technology and new mobility arrangements.
Transport behaviour and provision worldwide are changing rapidly in the face of climate change, emission-reduction targets, new technology, and new mobility arrangements.
Cities geared to public and active transport have less congestion than cities geared for private cars.
We want high-capacity, high-quality, all-electric, mass public transport, and more and safer cycling and walking infrastructure.
We want high-capacity, high-quality, all-electric, mass public transport, and cycling and walking facilities that are safe and attractive.
Promote a more liveable Wellington city, to be achieved by reducing reliance on the private car.
We want high-capacity, high-quality, all-electric, mass public transport, and more safe cycling and walking infrastructure.
Promote a more liveable Wellington city, to be achieved by reducing reliance on the private car.
We want high-capacity, high-quality, all-electric, mass public transport, and more and safer cycling and walking infrastructure.
Investing in more public and active transport instead of new motorways will:
Transport behaviour and provision worldwide are changing rapidly in the face of new technology and new mobility arrangements.
With mobility increasingly becoming a service, LGWM must not lock us into a private-vehicle–dominated model of transport provision that is already becoming obsolete.
We consider LGWM’s suggested interventions are over-weighted towards state highway spending, heading towards a result likely to be incompatible with these objectives.
We consider LGWM’s suggested interventions are over-weighted towards state highway spending, heading towards a result likely to be incompatible with these objectives.
Prepared by Save the Basin, Cycle Aware Wellington, Living Streets Aotearoa, and FIT: Fair Intelligent Transport Wellington
(:typeset-page fontsize=14pt fontset=kepler cover=none parasep=space colophon=off headingcolor=RoyalBlue justification=off ucsection=Auckland :)
Promote a more liveable Wellington city, to be achieved by reducing reliance on the private car.
We want high-capacity, high-quality, all-electric, mass public transport, and more safe cycling and walking infrastructure.
We support the objectives of the LGWM project3 in an open and transparent process.
We consider LGWM’s suggested interventions are over-weighted towards state highway spending, heading towards a result likely to be incompatible with these objectives.
We see cities geared to public and active transport have less congestion than cities geared for private cars.
We therefore call on LGWM to stick to its objectives and put the emphasis squarely on public and active transport, and managing travel demand, not on building more roads.
Last modified 05 June 2017 at 10:35 AM
1 The objectives for the LGWM project are to have a transport system that: · enhances the liveability of the central city · provides more efficient and reliable access for users · reduces reliance on private vehicle travel · improves safety for all users · is adaptable to disruptions and future uncertainty. (↑)
2 The objectives are to have a transport system that: · enhances the liveability of the central city · provides more efficient and reliable access for users · reduces reliance on private vehicle travel · improves safety for all users · is adaptable to disruptions and future uncertainty. (↑)
3 The objectives for the LGWM project are to have a transport system that: · enhances the liveability of the central city · provides more efficient and reliable access for users · reduces reliance on private vehicle travel · improves safety for all users · is adaptable to disruptions and future uncertainty. (↑)