FITWellington.LightRailFAQ History
Hide minor edits - Show changes to output
Added lines 244-252:
(:cellnr:)Construction
(:cell:)
full depth ~ 1-2 metres
utilities relocated
(:cell:)
shallow slab ~< 0.5 metres
minor/no utility relocation
Changed line 5 from:
Light rail is a form of public transport providing fast, efficient, clean service to people living in urban areas. It uses electric vehicles, running on tracks in existing roads, separated from other road traffic. It's designed to carry lots of people, with connections to buses and suburban trains at major interchanges. One multi-segment light rail vehicle can do the work of 5 or more buses.
to:
Light rail is a form of public transport providing fast, efficient, clean service to people living in urban areas. It uses electric vehicles, running on tracks in existing roads, separated from, and with priority over, other road traffic. It's designed to carry lots of people, with connections to buses and suburban trains at major interchanges. One multi-segment light rail vehicle can do the work of 5 or more buses.
Changed line 215 from:
* Achieve max speed ~ 80+ km/h
to:
* Achieve max speed ~ 80 km/h
Changed line 247 from:
For more information on the similarities and differences, see [[Streetcar and Light Rail Characteristics -> http://www.rtd-fastracks.com/media/uploads/gl/lrt_streetcar_analysis_formatted.pdf]].
to:
For illustrative examples and more information on the similarities and differences, see [[Streetcar and Light Rail Characteristics -> http://www.rtd-fastracks.com/media/uploads/gl/lrt_streetcar_analysis_formatted.pdf]].
Added lines 239-243:
(:cellnr:)Curves
(:cell:)
minimum radius >~ 25.9 metres
(:cell:)
minimum radius ~< 18.3 metres
Added line 242:
For more information on the similarities and differences, see [[Streetcar and Light Rail Characteristics -> http://www.rtd-fastracks.com/media/uploads/gl/lrt_streetcar_analysis_formatted.pdf]].
Changed line 186 from:
The [[defining differences -> http://humantransit.org/2010/03/streetcars-vs-light-rail-is-there-a-difference.html]] between light rail and tram systems are ''exclusivity of right-of-way'' and ''stop spacing''. Light rail is a form of rapid transit, designed to cover long distances quickly. Trams (streetcars) are essentially designed to do what local buses do.
to:
The [[defining differences -> http://humantransit.org/2010/03/streetcars-vs-light-rail-is-there-a-difference.html]] between light rail and tram systems are ''exclusivity of right-of-way'' and ''stop spacing''. Light rail is a form of rapid transit, designed to cover long distances quickly and predictably. Trams (streetcars) are essentially designed to do what local buses do.
Added lines 186-187:
The [[defining differences -> http://humantransit.org/2010/03/streetcars-vs-light-rail-is-there-a-difference.html]] between light rail and tram systems are ''exclusivity of right-of-way'' and ''stop spacing''. Light rail is a form of rapid transit, designed to cover long distances quickly. Trams (streetcars) are essentially designed to do what local buses do.
Changed line 191 from:
(:cell width=40%:)'''Tram'''
to:
(:cell width=40%:)'''Tram (streetcar)'''
Changed line 208 from:
* 5 min ~ max frequency (can be more frequent if needed)
to:
* 5 min ~ max frequency (can be more frequent)
Added lines 224-225:
stops may be closer together in the CBD
Added lines 228-229:
short rapid sections are the exception
Added lines 233-234:
grade separation at major intersections
Added lines 237-238:
Changed lines 221-223 from:
limited-stop/express
600-800 metres or more
to:
600-800 metres or more ~ limited stop/express
Changed lines 223-225 from:
local/limited-stop
200-400 metres
to:
200-400 metres ~ local/limited stop
Changed line 186 from:
(:table border=1 cell-padding=3 id=lightRailTram"Comparison of light rail and tram":)
to:
(:table border=1 id=lightRailTram"Comparison of light rail and tram":)
Added lines 221-222:
Added lines 225-226:
Added lines 228-232:
(:cellnr:)Control
(:cell:)
track signals, traffic signal pre-emption
(:cell:)
traffic signals, with signal priority
Added lines 185-225:
(:table border=1 cell-padding=3 id=lightRailTram"Comparison of light rail and tram":)
(:cellnr width=20%:)
(:cell width=40%:)'''Light rail'''
(:cell width=40%:)'''Tram'''
(:cellnr:)Purpose
(:cell:)
High capacity, high demand
Strong peak for commuters
(:cell:)
Moderate capacity and demand
Steady all day
(:cellnr:)Capacity
(:cell:)
1-4 car units ~ 125 pass/car (~ 60 seated)
* 2-2.5 min ~ max frequency
* 12,000 `- 15,000 pass/hr
(:cell:)
1 or 2 car trams ~ 120 pass/car (~ 30 seated)
* 5 min ~ max frequency (can be more frequent if needed)
* 1,440 pass/hr (5,760 max)
(:cellnr:)Design
(:cell:)
Exclusive or semi-exclusive right-of-way (limited mixed flow)
* Single track in short distances if needed
* Reliable schedules
* Achieve max speed ~ 80+ km/h
(:cell:)
Primarily semi-exclusive or mixed-flow with traffic
* Schedule includes delay
* Street speed max ~ 50 km/h
* Can reach 60+ km/h if conditions allow
(:cellnr:)Stop spacing
(:cell:)
600-800 metres or more
(:cell:)
200-400 metres
(:tableend:)
Changed lines 115-116 from:
# The buses using that part of Lambton Quay and Hunter St, although they will be fewer in number once light rail is built, have to go somewhere. One option is to use Customhouse Quay north of Willis St, then Grey St or Panama St. The feasibility of this route needs further investigation.
to:
# The buses using that part of Lambton Quay and Hunter St, although they will be fewer in number once light rail is built, have to go somewhere. One option is to use Customhouse Quay north of Willis St, then Grey St (northbound) and Panama St (southbound). The feasibility of this route needs further investigation.
Changed lines 119-122 from:
# Lambton Quay between Hunter and Willis streets would need to be widened to accommodate 2 light rail tracks. We do not see this as a problem--rail lines in Europe fit in streets as narrow as 9.1 metres, carrying [[over 100,000 passengers a day -> http://bettercities.net/article/new-french-revolution-21276]].
Once past Lambton Quay onto Willeston St, there are no significant problems.
to:
# Lambton Quay between Hunter and Willis streets cannot easily be widened to accommodate 2 light rail tracks (each lane is 2.9m wide). The best option at the Old Bank building is to run the southbound track on Hunter St and northbound track on Willeston St and Lambton Quay. We do not see width as a problem--rail lines in Europe fit in streets as narrow as 9.1 metres, carrying [[over 100,000 passengers a day -> http://bettercities.net/article/new-french-revolution-21276]].
Once past Lambton Quay onto Hunter St and Willeston St, there are no significant problems turning onto and off Jervois Quay.
Added lines 178-184:
=>(:toc-back:)
Q: What is the difference between trams and light rail?
Light rail is the modern version of the traditional tram. In most parts of the world, trams have been continuously developed into modern transport systems. But in some countries, including New Zealand, trams were not developed and eventually were discontinued, so now need to be introduced in a different form that is suitable for a modern city's public transport needs. The last tram route in Wellington, from Thorndon to Newtown, closed in [[May 1964 -> http://www.wcl.govt.nz/heritage/trams.html]].
Changed line 47 from:
=<'-[[source data -> Attach:french-cities.png"(c) Tom Parkinson, used with permission"]]-'
to:
=<'-[[source data -> Attach:french-cities.png]] ((c) Tom Parkinson, used with permission)-'
Changed line 47 from:
=<'-[[source data -> http://bettercities.net/sites/default/files/summary-table-french.jpg]]-'
to:
=<'-[[source data -> Attach:french-cities.png"(c) Tom Parkinson, used with permission"]]-'
Changed line 7 from:
%width=100pct id=shortLRT%Attach:french-lemans.jpg"light rail example" | French city of Le Mans: long vehicles, lots of doors, a baby stroller, station integrated with buildings, pavement, street
to:
%width=100pct id=shortLRT%Attach:french-lemans.jpg"light rail example" | French city of Le Mans: long vehicles, lots of doors, a baby stroller, station integrated with buildings, pavement, street (photo (c) Greg Thompson, used with permission)
Changed line 115 from:
# The buses using that part of Lambton Quay and Hunter St, although they will be fewer in number once light rail is built, have to go somewhere. One option is to use Customhouse Quay north of Willis St, then Panama St. The feasibility of this route needs further investigation.
to:
# The buses using that part of Lambton Quay and Hunter St, although they will be fewer in number once light rail is built, have to go somewhere. One option is to use Customhouse Quay north of Willis St, then Grey St or Panama St. The feasibility of this route needs further investigation.
Changed lines 5-6 from:
Light rail is a form of public transport providing fast, efficient, clean service to people living in urban areas. It uses electric vehicles, running on tracks in existing roads, separated from other road traffic. It's designed to carry lots of people, with connections to buses and suburban trains at major interchanges. One multi-segment light rail vehicle can do the work of 4-5 buses.
to:
Light rail is a form of public transport providing fast, efficient, clean service to people living in urban areas. It uses electric vehicles, running on tracks in existing roads, separated from other road traffic. It's designed to carry lots of people, with connections to buses and suburban trains at major interchanges. One multi-segment light rail vehicle can do the work of 5 or more buses.
Changed lines 26-28 from:
The first modern light rail line in North America opened in 1978, for the Commonwealth Games in Edmonton, Canada. Since then, installation costs have fallen steadily and the quality of service has got better and better. We now know that a successful light rail system has to fulfil 5 design goals:
to:
The first modern light rail line in North America opened in 1978, for the Commonwealth Games in Edmonton, Canada. Since then, installation costs have fallen steadily and the quality of service has got better and better. Light rail is highly configurable and can be tailored to meet the needs of a wide range of urban environments.
We now know that a successful light rail system has to fulfil 5 design goals:
Changed lines 162-177 from:
to:
=>(:toc-back:)
Q: Could BRT as proposed be upgraded to light rail in the future?
Wellington's golden mile (Lambton Quay, Willis Street, Manners Street) carries twice as many buses as a quality public transport corridor can handle.
Neither BRT nor light rail will work effectively if the same route also carries regular buses. This is because buses stop more often and there is not enough space for the faster BRT or light rail vehicles to pass, so the buses will delay them.
On the other hand, either BRT or light rail will be very inconvenient with no other buses. Many trips through the city centre will need two transfers.
The conclusion is that Wellington cannot have quality public transport until it has identified a 'secondary spine' through the CBD, so buses and BRT or light rail are fully separated.
Upgrading the proposed BRT route to light rail guarantees that light rail will perform poorly.
=>(:toc-back:)
Added lines 141-153:
=>(:toc-back:)
Q: Why are light rail stops widely spaced?
The aim is to place stops at the points of highest demand.
Unlike buses, which generally stop often, successful light rail lines have widely spaced stops. Stop placement is a trade-off between geography and chronology. If stops are too far apart, ridership declines, because it becomes too inconvenient to get to a station. On the other hand, if stops are too close together, ridership also declines, because frequent stops make the trip take too long -- every stop adds about a minute to the journey.
We also know that light rail stops have a halo effect -- attracting economic development around the stations. The ideal inter-stop distance is where the halo from one stop touches or overlaps slightly with that of the next stop. The data tell us that a halo extends to a radius of about 400m around a stop, giving a preferred inter-stop distance of about 700-800m. Where population densities are high, such as in the CBD, this may be reduced to 600m. Where stops are more than 800m apart, an economic dead zone tends to develop, because for most people, access requires a car.
The proposed Railway Station to Wellington Airport line is 8.3 km long, with an average inter-stop distance of 692m. Removing one stop would make the average inter-stop distance 755m.
Changed line 5 from:
Light rail is a form of public transport providing fast, efficient, clean service to people living in urban areas. It uses electric vehicles, running on tracks in existing roads, separated from other road traffic. It's designed to carry lots of people, with connections to buses and suburban trains at major interchanges. One multi-segment light rail vehicle can do the work of many buses.
to:
Light rail is a form of public transport providing fast, efficient, clean service to people living in urban areas. It uses electric vehicles, running on tracks in existing roads, separated from other road traffic. It's designed to carry lots of people, with connections to buses and suburban trains at major interchanges. One multi-segment light rail vehicle can do the work of 4-5 buses.
Changed line 5 from:
Light rail is a form of public transport providing fast, efficient, clean service to people living in urban areas. It uses electric vehicles, running on tracks in existing roads, separated from other road traffic. It's designed to carry lots of people, with connections to buses and suburban trains at major interchanges.
to:
Light rail is a form of public transport providing fast, efficient, clean service to people living in urban areas. It uses electric vehicles, running on tracks in existing roads, separated from other road traffic. It's designed to carry lots of people, with connections to buses and suburban trains at major interchanges. One multi-segment light rail vehicle can do the work of many buses.
Changed line 5 from:
Light rail is a form of public transport providing fast, efficient, clean service to people living in urban areas. It uses electric vehicles, running on tracks in existing roads, separated from other traffic. It's designed to carry lots of people and connects with buses and suburban trains at major interchanges.
to:
Light rail is a form of public transport providing fast, efficient, clean service to people living in urban areas. It uses electric vehicles, running on tracks in existing roads, separated from other road traffic. It's designed to carry lots of people, with connections to buses and suburban trains at major interchanges.
Changed line 7 from:
%width=100pct id=shortLRT%Attach:french-lemans.jpg"light rail example" | French city of LeMans: long vehicles, lots of doors, a baby stroller, station integrated with buildings, pavements, streets
to:
%width=100pct id=shortLRT%Attach:french-lemans.jpg"light rail example" | French city of Le Mans: long vehicles, lots of doors, a baby stroller, station integrated with buildings, pavement, street
Changed lines 3-4 from:
to:
Q:What is light rail? The short version!
Light rail is a form of public transport providing fast, efficient, clean service to people living in urban areas. It uses electric vehicles, running on tracks in existing roads, separated from other traffic. It's designed to carry lots of people and connects with buses and suburban trains at major interchanges.
%width=100pct id=shortLRT%Attach:french-lemans.jpg"light rail example" | French city of LeMans: long vehicles, lots of doors, a baby stroller, station integrated with buildings, pavements, streets
=>(:toc-back:)
Q: What is light rail? The long version!
Changed line 149 from:
to:
Added lines 132-138:
=>(:toc-back:)
Q: Why did the spine study reject light rail?
(:include PublicTransportSpineStudy:)
Added lines 26-27:
Light rail's critics say that Wellington's population is too small.
Added lines 32-33:
Wellington city (population about 190,000) serves a wider Greater Wellington population of about 490,000.
Changed line 36 from:
([[source data -> http://bettercities.net/sites/default/files/summary-table-french.jpg]])
to:
=<'-[[source data -> http://bettercities.net/sites/default/files/summary-table-french.jpg]]-'
Changed line 17 from:
The first modern light rail line in north America opened in 1978, for the Commonwealth Games in Edmonton, Canada. Since then, installation costs have fallen steadily and the quality of service has got better and better. We now know that a successful light rail system has to fulfil 5 design goals:
to:
The first modern light rail line in North America opened in 1978, for the Commonwealth Games in Edmonton, Canada. Since then, installation costs have fallen steadily and the quality of service has got better and better. We now know that a successful light rail system has to fulfil 5 design goals:
Changed line 15 from:
Light rail was devised in the 1970s as a way to create a public transport service that meets these needs. Light rail operates on tracks embedded in or beside existing streets, using rolling-stock similar to trams, but with higher capacity, usually on a dedicated right-of-way. It uses either single tramcars or multiple segments joined together to form a street-train.
to:
Light rail was devised in Europe in the 1970s, as a way to create a public transport service that meets these needs. Light rail operates on tracks embedded in or beside existing streets, using rolling-stock similar to trams, but with higher capacity, usually on a dedicated right-of-way. It uses either single tramcars or multiple segments joined together to form a street-train.
Changed lines 28-30 from:
Light rail systems are operating cost-effectively in cities of all sizes, from a population of 100,000 up. For example, of the 27 French tram systems in operation or under construction, 14 are operating in cities with less than 400,000 population and five are in cities of under 200,000 population. A single line, which is where Wellington would start, typically carries 10,000 people per km.
to:
Light rail systems are operating cost-effectively in cities of all sizes, from a population of 100,000 up. For example, of the 27 French tram systems in operation or under construction, 14 are operating in cities with less than 400,000 population and five are in cities of under 200,000 population. A single line, which is where Wellington would start, typically carries up to 10,000 people per km.
One reason light rail is well-suited to smaller cities, like Wellington, is its flexible capacity. To increase capacity, the operator simply adds another segment to an existing tram. This avoids most of the cost other urban transport modes incur of adding another vehicle and another driver.
Added lines 29-30:
([[source data -> http://bettercities.net/sites/default/files/summary-table-french.jpg]])
Added lines 25-26:
There are light rail systems in hundreds of cities all over the world and many more are under construction.
Changed lines 21-23 from:
to:
Changed line 28 from:
to:
Changed lines 17-18 from:
A successful light rail system has to meet 5 design goals:
to:
The first modern light rail line in north America opened in 1978, for the Commonwealth Games in Edmonton, Canada. Since then, installation costs have fallen steadily and the quality of service has got better and better. We now know that a successful light rail system has to fulfil 5 design goals:
Added lines 23-28:
Q:Is Wellington big enough for light rail?
Light rail systems are operating cost-effectively in cities of all sizes, from a population of 100,000 up. For example, of the 27 French tram systems in operation or under construction, 14 are operating in cities with less than 400,000 population and five are in cities of under 200,000 population. A single line, which is where Wellington would start, typically carries 10,000 people per km.
(:toc-back:)
Added lines 2-23:
Q:What is light rail?
Whenever you ask people living in cities what they want from their public transport service, you get the same answers:
* We need to put public transport where lots of people are;
* We need to make sure that public transport is there when people need it; and
* We need to make sure the total trip time is reasonably fast and really reliable.
Experience shows that when cities do this, many people switch from their cars to public transport. They also view the public transport service as one of the things that makes their city a great place to live.
Light rail was devised in the 1970s as a way to create a public transport service that meets these needs. Light rail operates on tracks embedded in or beside existing streets, using rolling-stock similar to trams, but with higher capacity, usually on a dedicated right-of-way. It uses either single tramcars or multiple segments joined together to form a street-train.
A successful light rail system has to meet 5 design goals:
(:include ArtOfLightRailInsertion#designCharacteristics:)
(:toc-back:)
Changed lines 80-82 from:
Q: What's wrong with a Willis Street, Manners Street, Courtenay Place, Basin route?
This is the route recommended in the {PTSS|Public Transport Spine Study} and a number of earlier studies. This route is not "wrong" as such--it just uses different design parameters. The options we have developed give priority to a number of factors, including:
to:
Q: What about a Willis Street, Manners Street, Courtenay Place, Basin route?
This is the route recommended in the {PTSS|Public Transport Spine Study} and a number of earlier studies. This route is not "wrong"--it just uses different design parameters to those we have used. The options we have developed give priority to a number of factors, including:
Changed line 84 from:
* To make the service fast and reliable, run light rail on a dedicated right-of-way, especially in the CBD. A Willis`-Manners St route would require buses and trams to share the same lane in both directions, which introduces the risk of unplanned delay to the light rail service.
to:
* To make the service fast and reliable, run light rail on a dedicated right-of-way where possible, especially in the CBD. A Willis`-Manners St route would require buses and trams to share the same lane in both directions, which introduces the risk of unplanned delay to the light rail service.
Changed lines 80-85 from:
Q: What's wrong with a Willis Street, Manners Street, Courtenay Place, Basin Reserve route?
This is the route recommended in the {PTSS|Public Transport Spine Study}. This route is not "wrong" as such--it just uses different design parameters. The options we have developed give priority to a number of factors, including:
* Where possible, run the light rail tracks on a dedicated right-of-way, especially in the CBD. A Willis`-Manners St route would require buses and trams to share the same lane in both directions, which introduces the risk of delay to the light rail service.
to:
Q: What's wrong with a Willis Street, Manners Street, Courtenay Place, Basin route?
This is the route recommended in the {PTSS|Public Transport Spine Study} and a number of earlier studies. This route is not "wrong" as such--it just uses different design parameters. The options we have developed give priority to a number of factors, including:
* To make the service fast and reliable, run light rail on a dedicated right-of-way, especially in the CBD. A Willis`-Manners St route would require buses and trams to share the same lane in both directions, which introduces the risk of unplanned delay to the light rail service.
Changed line 93 from:
We have shown that there are viable alternatives to the route proposed in the PTSS, and we believe that these deserve consideration. We have no view on which option would be the best route.
to:
We have shown that there are viable alternatives to the route proposed in the PTSS, and we consider that these deserve consideration, as they are better value for money. We have no view on which option would be the best route.
Added lines 79-95:
Q: What's wrong with a Willis Street, Manners Street, Courtenay Place, Basin Reserve route?
This is the route recommended in the {PTSS|Public Transport Spine Study}. This route is not "wrong" as such--it just uses different design parameters. The options we have developed give priority to a number of factors, including:
* Where possible, run the light rail tracks on a dedicated right-of-way, especially in the CBD. A Willis`-Manners St route would require buses and trams to share the same lane in both directions, which introduces the risk of delay to the light rail service.
* Light rail needs to go where lots of people are and we gave preference to the high demand generated by the Massey University campus on Wallace Street, over the expected future demand on Adelaide Road south of the Basin.
* Now that the High Court has rejected NZTA's plan for a Basin flyover, there is at present no solution to the problem of improving traffic flow around the Basin. By removing light rail from the mix, the traffic problem at the Basin becomes smaller and potentially more tractable.
* Use of a dedicated light rail right-of-way means there would be minimal disruption to existing bus services during the construction period.
We have shown that there are viable alternatives to the route proposed in the PTSS, and we believe that these deserve consideration. We have no view on which option would be the best route.
=>(:toc-back:)
Changed line 70 from:
# Lambton Quay between Hunter and Willis streets would need to be widened to accommodate 2 light rail tracks. We do not see this as a problem--double tracks in Europe fit in spaces as narrow as 9.1 metres.
to:
# Lambton Quay between Hunter and Willis streets would need to be widened to accommodate 2 light rail tracks. We do not see this as a problem--rail lines in Europe fit in streets as narrow as 9.1 metres, carrying [[over 100,000 passengers a day -> http://bettercities.net/article/new-french-revolution-21276]].
Added lines 74-75:
The proposed Panama St option is the technically conservative one. If the full Lambton Quay route proves feasible and affordable, this would be the preferred path for this option.
Changed lines 36-37 from:
Q: How How do you integrate light rail into the wider transport landscape?
to:
Q: How do you integrate light rail into the wider transport landscape?
Added lines 50-76:
Q: Why does the inner city route option go along Panama Street?
Fig(innerCityQ) shows a dotted line on Lambton Quay south of Panama Street.
%center id=innerCityQ%[[Attach:inner-city-map.png"Inner City Map" -> Attach:inner-city-map.pdf]]
Between Panama and Hunter streets, Lambton Quay is 2 lanes wide, narrowing to one lane between Hunter and Willis streets. This means that to provide a 2-track dedicated right-of-way along that stretch, the buses currently running there must be re-routed. There is no problem north of Panama St because we can use the 2 west (Terrace) side lanes for light rail and the 2 east side lanes for buses and other vehicles.
It is highly desirable from an amenity point of view to continue light rail along Lambton Quay. It would make the south end of Lambton Quay a pedestrian-friendly zone and reduce noise and pollution from the diesel buses. It would also be faster, eliminating the sharp turn onto Panama St.
However, there are 3 potential obstacles:
# The buses using that part of Lambton Quay and Hunter St, although they will be fewer in number once light rail is built, have to go somewhere. One option is to use Customhouse Quay north of Willis St, then Panama St. The feasibility of this route needs further investigation.
# A large number of underground services at the corner of Willis St and Lambton Quay would need to be relocated. At this stage, we do not have enough information to estimate the potential cost of this work.
# Lambton Quay between Hunter and Willis streets would need to be widened to accommodate 2 light rail tracks. We do not see this as a problem--double tracks in Europe fit in spaces as narrow as 9.1 metres.
Once past Lambton Quay onto Willeston St, there are no significant problems.
=>(:toc-back:)
Changed line 9 from:
inexpensive to make trams longer or to increase service frequency. This
to:
inexpensive to make trams longer (still with only one driver) or to increase service frequency. This
Changed lines 12-13 from:
grows, the trams get more crowded, but the schedule is unaffected.
to:
grows, the trams get more crowded, more capacity is added, and the schedule is unaffected.
Changed line 47 from:
To meet the 2030 goal, construction would need to start in 2020.
to:
To meet the 2030 goal, construction would need to start by 2020.
Added lines 1-49:
(:toc:)
Q:Why light rail?
Once cities reach Wellington's size and public transport ridership, light
rail becomes a more cost-effective infrastructure investment than buses on
high demand corridors. This is because while the up-front cost is high,
the marginal cost of adding capacity is low. It's comparatively
inexpensive to make trams longer or to increase service frequency. This
means light rail, unlike buses, is a congestion-free solution. When roads
become congested, everyone experiences congestion. When light rail demand
grows, the trams get more crowded, but the schedule is unaffected.
=>(:toc-back:)
Q:Why light rail now?
Continuous improvement to the bus service in Wellington will deliver incremental
gains. Future-proofing Wellington's infrastructure to support a vibrant and
growing population and commercial centre requires more than this. A step
change in performance is achievable, but it requires a paradigm shift,
which our research indicates that light rail can now deliver.
Wellington has talked about light rail since the early 1990s. Although the
time has not been right up until now, the idea has not gone away. That in
itself tells a story.
Now we have a limited window of opportunity to review this option with an
open mind, before decisions around the Basin Reserve are made that preclude
us considering the full range of options for another 25 years.
=>(:toc-back:)
Q: How How do you integrate light rail into the wider transport landscape?
The best way forward is to adopt ANewPublicTransportApproach as a "straw
man". Those considering options for the Basin Reserve can test their
proposals in light of our proposal, noting that if adopted, our proposal
makes the Basin problem less complex. Those developing the BRT business
case would include the light rail proposal as an option. And the proposal
needs close scrutiny, to identify potential show-stoppers and how these
could be addressed. This would include considering the route options we have
proposed, assessing their strengths and weaknesses, and identifying a preferred route for in-depth study.
To meet the 2030 goal, construction would need to start in 2020.
=>(:toc-back:)