Recent Changes
Recent Changes · Search:

FITWellington.​LightRailOptionsSurvey History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to output

13 October 2015 at 01:10 PM by John Rankin - clarify the questionnaire wording
Changed line 12 from:
To what extent do you agree with the following statement? "From reading '/A New Public Transport Approach/', I have a well-informed opinion on the options proposed."
to:
To what extent do you agree with the following statement? "From reading and reflecting on '/A New Public Transport Approach/', I have developed an informed opinion on the options proposed."
13 October 2015 at 01:04 PM by John Rankin - clarify the questionnaire wording
Changed line 8 from:
The purpose of this survey is to gather views on the light rail route options presented in '/A New Public Transport Approach/'. See the route maps on pages 6 and 8. FIT Wellington will use the survey results to enhance its communication and present more information on any options which emerge as heavily favoured. The survey will take 5-10 minutes to complete.
to:
The purpose of this survey is to gather views on the light rail route options presented in '/A New Public Transport Approach/'. See the route maps on pages 6 and 8. FIT Wellington will use the results to enhance its communication and present more information on any options which emerge as heavily favoured. The survey will take 5-10 minutes to complete.
13 October 2015 at 01:03 PM by John Rankin - clarify the questionnaire wording
Changed line 8 from:
The purpose of this survey is to gather views on the light rail route options presented in '/A New Public Transport Approach/'. See the route maps on pages 6 and 8. FIT Wellington will use the survey results to enhance its communication, giving more emphasis to options which emerge as heavily favoured. The survey will take 5-10 minutes to complete.
to:
The purpose of this survey is to gather views on the light rail route options presented in '/A New Public Transport Approach/'. See the route maps on pages 6 and 8. FIT Wellington will use the survey results to enhance its communication and present more information on any options which emerge as heavily favoured. The survey will take 5-10 minutes to complete.
13 October 2015 at 12:52 PM by John Rankin - clarify the questionnaire wording
Deleted lines 15-16:
[ ] Neutral
Changed lines 36-37 from:
[ ] I prefer Lambton Quay
to:
[ ] I prefer Lambton Quay and Willeston St
Changed lines 52-53 from:
From Newtown to Kilbirnie, the line could go to the zoo with a tunnel to Kilbirnie or along Constable St and Crawford Road. The tunnel option adds about $210';m;' to the cost. Which do you prefer?
to:
From Newtown to Kilbirnie, the line could go to the zoo with a tunnel to Kilbirnie, at a cost of $656';m;', or along Constable St and Crawford Road, at a cost of $444';m;'. In other words, the tunnel option adds about $210';m;' to the cost. Which do you prefer?
Changed lines 61-62 from:
If an extra $210';m;' was available, it would pay for over 4km of track. Which do you think would offer the best value for money?
to:
The $210';m;' it would cost for the tunnel option could pay for over 4km of surface track. Which do you think would offer the best value for money?
Changed line 67 from:
[ ] Neither: we can't afford to spend more
to:
[ ] Neither: we can't afford to spend more than $450';m;'
30 September 2015 at 03:41 PM by John Rankin - add reference to route maps
Changed line 8 from:
The purpose of this survey is to gather views on the light rail route options presented in '/A New Public Transport Approach/'. FIT Wellington will use the survey results to enhance its communication, giving more emphasis to options which emerge as heavily favoured. The survey will take 5-10 minutes to complete.
to:
The purpose of this survey is to gather views on the light rail route options presented in '/A New Public Transport Approach/'. See the route maps on pages 6 and 8. FIT Wellington will use the survey results to enhance its communication, giving more emphasis to options which emerge as heavily favoured. The survey will take 5-10 minutes to complete.
30 September 2015 at 02:55 PM by John Rankin - add an introduction
Changed line 8 from:
The purpose of this survey is to gather views on the route options presented in '/A New Public Transport Approach/'. FIT Wellington will use the survey results to enhance its communication, giving more emphasis to options which emerge as heavily favoured. The survey will take 5-10 minutes to complete.
to:
The purpose of this survey is to gather views on the light rail route options presented in '/A New Public Transport Approach/'. FIT Wellington will use the survey results to enhance its communication, giving more emphasis to options which emerge as heavily favoured. The survey will take 5-10 minutes to complete.
30 September 2015 at 02:54 PM by John Rankin - add an introduction
Changed line 8 from:
The purpose of this survey is to gather views on the route options presented in '/A New Public Transport Approach/'. FIT Wellington will use the survey results to enhance its communication, giving more emphasis to those options which may emerge as heavily favoured. The survey will take 5-10 minutes to complete.
to:
The purpose of this survey is to gather views on the route options presented in '/A New Public Transport Approach/'. FIT Wellington will use the survey results to enhance its communication, giving more emphasis to options which emerge as heavily favoured. The survey will take 5-10 minutes to complete.
30 September 2015 at 02:52 PM by John Rankin - add an introduction
Added lines 7-11:

The purpose of this survey is to gather views on the route options presented in '/A New Public Transport Approach/'. FIT Wellington will use the survey results to enhance its communication, giving more emphasis to those options which may emerge as heavily favoured. The survey will take 5-10 minutes to complete.

[ ] Read and understood

Changed line 24 from:
* Go to 8
to:
* Go to 9
30 September 2015 at 01:40 PM by John Rankin - tweak layout
Changed lines 15-16 from:
If you ticked Disagree 
to:
If you ticked Disagree:
Changed line 19 from:
* Skip to 8
to:
* Go to 8
30 September 2015 at 01:36 PM by John Rankin - reformat the questions
Changed lines 5-65 from:
(:typeset-page fontset=kepler subtitle="For each question, please tick one box" colophon=off parasep=space :)

# To what extent do you agree with the following statement? "From reading '/A New Public Transport Approach/', I have a well-informed opinion on the options proposed."

  [ ] Strongly agree

  [ ] Agree

  [ ] Neutral

  [ ] Disagree

  [ ] Strongly disagree


# On leaving the railway station, the light rail line could go along Lambton Quay or along the waterfront. Which do you prefer?

  [ ] I prefer Lambton Quay (option 1a)

  [ ] I am neutral

  [ ] I prefer
the waterfront (option 1b)


# If the route follows Lambton Quay, the line could go to the Willis St corner onto Willeston St or turn at Panama St. Which do you prefer?

  [ ] I prefer Lambton Quay

  [ ] I am neutral

  [ ] I prefer Panama Street


# Once past the Michael Fowler Centre, the line could go along Cuba St onto Abel Smith St or along
Taranaki St. Which do you prefer?

  [ ] I prefer Cuba Street (option 2a)

  [ ]  I am neutral

  [ ] I prefer Taranaki Street (option 2b)


# From Newtown
to Kilbirnie, the line could go to the zoo with a tunnel to Kilbirnie or along Constable St and Crawford Road. The tunnel option adds about $210';m;' to the cost. Which do you prefer?

  [ ] I prefer the zoo and a tunnel (option 3a)

  [ ] I am neutral

  [
] I prefer Constable Street (option 3b)


# If an extra $210';m;' was available, it would pay for over 4km of track. Which do you think would offer the best value for money?

  [ ] A tunnel from the zoo to Kilbirnie

  [ ] An extension to the line (to be determined)

  [ ] Neither: we can't afford to spend more


# Comments
to:
(:typeset-page fontset=kepler subtitle="For each question, please tick one box" colophon=off parasep=number :)

To what extent do you agree with the following statement? "From reading '/A New Public Transport Approach/', I have a well-informed opinion on the options proposed."

[ ] Agree

[ ] Neutral

[ ] Disagree

If you ticked Disagree


* Please explain why

* Skip to 8


On leaving the railway station, the light rail line could go along Lambton Quay or along the waterfront. Which do you prefer?

[ ] I prefer Lambton Quay (option 1a)

[ ] I am neutral

[ ] I prefer the waterfront (option 1b)


If the route follows Lambton Quay, the line could go to
the Willis St corner onto Willeston St or turn at Panama St. Which do you prefer?

[ ] I prefer Lambton Quay

[ ] I am neutral

[ ] I prefer Panama Street


Once past the Michael Fowler Centre, the line could go along Cuba St onto Abel Smith St or along Taranaki St. Which do you prefer?

[ ] I prefer Cuba Street (option 2a)

[ ]  I am neutral

[ ] I prefer
Taranaki Street (option 2b)


From Newtown to Kilbirnie, the line could go to the zoo with a tunnel to Kilbirnie or along Constable St and Crawford Road. The tunnel option adds about $210';m;'
to the cost. Which do you prefer?

[ ] I prefer the zoo and a tunnel (option 3a)

[ ] I am neutral

[ ] I prefer Constable Street (option 3b)


If an extra $210';m;' was available, it would pay for over 4km of track. Which do you think would offer the best value for money?

[
] A tunnel from the zoo to Kilbirnie

[ ] An extension to the line (to be determined)

[ ] Neither: we can't afford to spend more


Any other comments
30 September 2015 at 09:28 AM by John Rankin - remove reference to Mt Albert
Changed line 58 from:
  [ ] A tunnel under Mt Albert
to:
  [ ] A tunnel from the zoo to Kilbirnie
30 September 2015 at 09:23 AM by John Rankin - remove reference to Mt Albert
Changed line 47 from:
# From Newtown to Kilbirnie, the line could go to the zoo with a tunnel under Mt Albert or along Constable St and Crawford Road. The tunnel option adds about $210';m;' to the cost. Which do you prefer?
to:
# From Newtown to Kilbirnie, the line could go to the zoo with a tunnel to Kilbirnie or along Constable St and Crawford Road. The tunnel option adds about $210';m;' to the cost. Which do you prefer?
29 September 2015 at 06:09 PM by John Rankin - use small cap M
Changed lines 47-48 from:
# From Newtown to Kilbirnie, the line could go to the zoo with a tunnel under Mt Albert or along Constable St and Crawford Road. The tunnel option adds about $210M to the cost. Which do you prefer?
to:
# From Newtown to Kilbirnie, the line could go to the zoo with a tunnel under Mt Albert or along Constable St and Crawford Road. The tunnel option adds about $210';m;' to the cost. Which do you prefer?
Changed line 56 from:
# If an extra $210M was available, it would pay for over 4km of track. Which do you think would offer the best value for money?
to:
# If an extra $210';m;' was available, it would pay for over 4km of track. Which do you think would offer the best value for money?
29 September 2015 at 06:07 PM by John Rankin - add Q7
Changed lines 1-4 from:
=<This page is a mock-up of a survey form to gather data on people's views of the options identified in ANewPublicTransportApproach. There is no ''Submit'' button--it is not a live survey, but it can be printed and used as a paper form.


to:
=<This page is a mock-up of a survey form to gather data on people's views of the options identified in ANewPublicTransportApproach. There is no ''Submit'' button--it is not an on-line survey, but it can be printed and used as a paper form.


Changed lines 7-8 from:
# To what extent do you agree with the following statement? "From reading '/A New Public Transport Approach/' I now have a well-informed opinion on the options proposed."
to:
# To what extent do you agree with the following statement? "From reading '/A New Public Transport Approach/', I have a well-informed opinion on the options proposed."
Changed lines 56-57 from:
# If an extra $210M was available, it would pay for over 4km of track. What do you think would offer the best value for money?
to:
# If an extra $210M was available, it would pay for over 4km of track. Which do you think would offer the best value for money?
Changed line 65 from:
Comments:
to:
# Comments
29 September 2015 at 06:01 PM by John Rankin - clarify Q3
Changed line 29 from:
# If the route follows Lambton Quay, the line could go all the way to Willis St onto Willeston St or turn at Panama St. Which do you prefer?
to:
# If the route follows Lambton Quay, the line could go to the Willis St corner onto Willeston St or turn at Panama St. Which do you prefer?
29 September 2015 at 05:55 PM by John Rankin - simplify questions
Changed lines 3-8 from:
For each question, please tick one box.

(:typeset-page fontset
=kepler subtitle="Tell us what you think" colophon=off parasep=space :)

# To what extent do you agree with the following statement? "From reading the article, '/A New Public Transport Approach/',
I now have a well-informed opinion on the options proposed."
to:


(:typeset-page fontset=kepler subtitle="For each
question, please tick one box" colophon=off parasep=space :)

# To
what extent do you agree with the following statement? "From reading '/A New Public Transport Approach/' I now have a well-informed opinion on the options proposed."
Changed lines 20-21 from:
# On leaving the railway station, the light rail line could go along Lambton Quay or along the waterfront. Do you have a preference?
to:
# On leaving the railway station, the light rail line could go along Lambton Quay or along the waterfront. Which do you prefer?
Changed lines 29-30 from:
# If the route follows Lambton Quay, the line could go all the way to Willis St onto Willeston St or turn at Panama St. Do you have a preference?
to:
# If the route follows Lambton Quay, the line could go all the way to Willis St onto Willeston St or turn at Panama St. Which do you prefer?
Changed lines 38-39 from:
# Once past the Michael Fowler Centre, the line could go along Cuba St onto Abel Smith St or along Taranaki St. Do you have a preference?
to:
# Once past the Michael Fowler Centre, the line could go along Cuba St onto Abel Smith St or along Taranaki St. Which do you prefer?
Changed lines 47-48 from:
# From Newtown to Kilbirnie, the line could go to the zoo with a tunnel under Mt Albert or along Constable St and Crawford Road. The tunnel option adds about $210M to the cost. Do you have a preference?
to:
# From Newtown to Kilbirnie, the line could go to the zoo with a tunnel under Mt Albert or along Constable St and Crawford Road. The tunnel option adds about $210M to the cost. Which do you prefer?
Changed lines 56-57 from:
# If an extra $210M in funding was available, it would pay for over 4km of track. What do you think would offer the best value for money?
to:
# If an extra $210M was available, it would pay for over 4km of track. What do you think would offer the best value for money?
Changed line 65 from:
# Do you have any comments?
to:
Comments:
29 September 2015 at 05:48 PM by John Rankin - reword Q1
Changed lines 5-7 from:
(:typeset-page fontset=kepler subtitle="Tell us what you think" colophon=off :)

# You have read the article, '/A New Public Transport Approach/'; to what extent do you agree with the following statement? "From reading the article, I now have a well-informed opinion on the options proposed."
to:
(:typeset-page fontset=kepler subtitle="Tell us what you think" colophon=off parasep=space :)

# To what extent do you agree with the following statement? "From reading the article, '/A New Public Transport Approach/', I now have a well-informed opinion on the options proposed."
29 September 2015 at 05:45 PM by John Rankin - convert to paper form
Changed lines 1-32 from:
This page is a mock-up of a survey form to gather data on people's views of the options identified in ANewPublicTransportApproach. There is no ''Submit'' button--it is not a live survey.

(:input form:)
On leaving the railway station, the light rail line could go along Lambton Quay or along the waterfront. Do you have a preference?\\
(:input radio name=option1 value=a:) I prefer Lambton Quay\\
(:input radio name=option1 value=x checked=checked:) I am neutral\\
(:input radio name=option1 value=b:) I prefer the waterfront

If the route follows Lambton Quay, the line could go all the way to Willis St onto Willeston St or turn at Panama St. Do you have a preference?\\
(:input radio name=option1Z value=a:) I prefer Lambton Quay\\
(:input radio name=option1Z value=x checked=checked:) I am neutral\\
(:input radio name=option1Z value=b:) I prefer Panama Street

Once past the Michael Fowler Centre, the line could go along Cuba St onto Abel Smith St or along Taranaki St. Do you have a preference?\\
(:input radio name=option2 value=a:) I prefer Cuba Street\\
(:input radio name=option2 value=x checked=checked:) I am neutral\\
(:input radio name=option2 value=b:) I prefer Taranaki Street

From Newtown to Kilbirnie, the line could go to the zoo with a tunnel under Mt Albert or along Constable St and Crawford Road. The tunnel option adds about $210M to the cost. Do you have a preference?\\
(:input radio name=option3 value=a:) I prefer the zoo and a tunnel\\
(:input radio name=option3 value=x checked=checked:) I am neutral\\
(:input radio name=option3 value=b:) I prefer Constable Street

If an extra $210M in funding was forthcoming, it would pay for over 4km of track. What do you think would offer the best value for money?\\
(:input radio name=option4 value=a:) A tunnel under Mt Albert\\
(:input radio name=option4 value=b:) A waterfront loop from the Interislander terminal to Te Papa\\
(:input radio name=option4 value=c:) A spur line to Island Bay\\
(:input radio name=option4 value=x:) Other (please specify) (:input text name=option4txt:)



(:input end:)
to:
=<This page is a mock-up of a survey form to gather data on people's views of the options identified in ANewPublicTransportApproach. There is no ''Submit'' button--it is not a live survey, but it can be printed and used as a paper form.

For each question, please tick one box.

(:typeset-page fontset=kepler subtitle="Tell us what you think" colophon=off :)

# You have read the article, '/A New Public Transport Approach/'; to what extent do you agree with the following statement? "From reading the article, I now have a well-informed opinion on the options proposed."

  [ ] Strongly agree

  [ ] Agree

  [ ] Neutral

  [ ] Disagree

  [ ] Strongly disagree


# On leaving the railway station, the light rail line could go along Lambton Quay or along the waterfront. Do you have a preference?

  [ ] I prefer Lambton Quay (option 1a)

  [ ] I am neutral

  [ ] I prefer the waterfront (option 1b)


# If the route follows Lambton Quay, the line could go all the way to Willis St onto Willeston St or turn at Panama St. Do you have a preference?

  [ ] I prefer Lambton Quay

  [ ] I am neutral

  [ ] I prefer Panama Street


# Once past the Michael Fowler Centre, the line could go along Cuba St onto Abel Smith St or along Taranaki St. Do you have a preference?

  [ ] I prefer Cuba Street (option 2a)

  [ ]  I am neutral

  [ ] I prefer Taranaki Street (option 2b)


# From Newtown to Kilbirnie, the line could go to the zoo with a tunnel under Mt Albert or along Constable St and Crawford Road. The tunnel option adds about $210M to the cost. Do you have a preference?

  [ ] I prefer the zoo and a tunnel (option 3a)

  [ ] I am neutral

  [ ] I prefer Constable Street (option 3b)


# If an extra $210M in funding was available, it would pay for over 4km of track. What do you think would offer the best value for money?

  [ ] A tunnel under Mt Albert

  [ ] An extension to the line (to be determined)

  [ ] Neither: we can't afford to spend more


# Do you have any comments?

15 September 2015 at 09:21 AM by John Rankin - add a value for money question
Added lines 23-30:

If an extra $210M in funding was forthcoming, it would pay for over 4km of track. What do you think would offer the best value for money?\\
(:input radio name=option4 value=a:) A tunnel under Mt Albert\\
(:input radio name=option4 value=b:) A waterfront loop from the Interislander terminal to Te Papa\\
(:input radio name=option4 value=c:) A spur line to Island Bay\\
(:input radio name=option4 value=x:) Other (please specify) (:input text name=option4txt:)

14 September 2015 at 08:13 PM by John Rankin - survey form mock-up
Added lines 1-24:
This page is a mock-up of a survey form to gather data on people's views of the options identified in ANewPublicTransportApproach. There is no ''Submit'' button--it is not a live survey.

(:input form:)
On leaving the railway station, the light rail line could go along Lambton Quay or along the waterfront. Do you have a preference?\\
(:input radio name=option1 value=a:) I prefer Lambton Quay\\
(:input radio name=option1 value=x checked=checked:) I am neutral\\
(:input radio name=option1 value=b:) I prefer the waterfront

If the route follows Lambton Quay, the line could go all the way to Willis St onto Willeston St or turn at Panama St. Do you have a preference?\\
(:input radio name=option1Z value=a:) I prefer Lambton Quay\\
(:input radio name=option1Z value=x checked=checked:) I am neutral\\
(:input radio name=option1Z value=b:) I prefer Panama Street

Once past the Michael Fowler Centre, the line could go along Cuba St onto Abel Smith St or along Taranaki St. Do you have a preference?\\
(:input radio name=option2 value=a:) I prefer Cuba Street\\
(:input radio name=option2 value=x checked=checked:) I am neutral\\
(:input radio name=option2 value=b:) I prefer Taranaki Street

From Newtown to Kilbirnie, the line could go to the zoo with a tunnel under Mt Albert or along Constable St and Crawford Road. The tunnel option adds about $210M to the cost. Do you have a preference?\\
(:input radio name=option3 value=a:) I prefer the zoo and a tunnel\\
(:input radio name=option3 value=x checked=checked:) I am neutral\\
(:input radio name=option3 value=b:) I prefer Constable Street

(:input end:)
Page last modified 13 October 2015 at 01:10 PM