Recent Changes
Recent Changes · Search:

FITWellington.​MRTTalkingPoints2026 History

Show minor edits - Show changes to markup

03 April 2026 at 08:00 AM by John Rankin - spell out title
Added lines 3-4:

(:title Mass Rapid Transit Talking Points 2026:)

Changed line 10 from:

Don’t be too ambitious to start with — make the first MRT line something that will rally the maximum possible support and minimise opposition — such as: Ferry Terminals, Rail Station, City Centre to Hospital Parkway and Newtown — keep it as a core (busy all day, every day) line 1, with lots of potential for extensions to new constituencies in future — sell it as something that will help the motorist.

to:

Don’t be too ambitious to start with — make the first MRT (mass rapid transit) line something that will rally the maximum possible support and minimise opposition — such as: Ferry Terminals, Rail Station, City Centre to Hospital Parkway and Newtown — keep it as a core (busy all day, every day) line 1, with lots of potential for extensions to new constituencies in future — sell it as something that will help the motorist.

10 March 2026 at 07:53 PM by John Rankin - Add sidebars
Changed line 5 from:
to:

Carpe diem

Added line 8:

Start small

Changed lines 11-12 from:

Make high ridership the primary criterion of success — it has to be convenient, popular and seen as a success — forget about the economics — make it about transit-oriented development, affordability and integration with the rest of the PT system — it needs to be free if another PT ticket is purchased, services must be very frequent, fast, high quality, reliable and interchange needs to be seamless. It may take a change of government to implement, but make sure the project is ready to fast-track when the planets are aligned.

to:

Be useful to many people Make high ridership the primary criterion of success — it has to be accessible, popular and seen as a success — forget about the economics — make it about transit-oriented development, affordability and integration with the rest of the PT system — it needs to be free if another PT ticket is purchased, services must be very frequent, fast, high quality, reliable, and interchange needs to be seamless. It may take a change of government to implement, but make sure the project is ready to fast-track when the planets are aligned.

Set quality standards

Changed line 17 from:

Scalable across decades

to:

Scale over decades

Added line 20:

Find people who deliver

07 March 2026 at 11:49 AM by John Rankin - first draft
Added lines 1-13:

Meeting with Greater Wellington March 2026

First, well done, keep going and don’t give up �– there are genuine affordable modal alternatives between the car and heavy rail �– buses are essential and will always be needed but they (alone) can never fill the “missing mode” gap.

Don’t be too ambitious to start with - make the first MRT line something that will rally the maximum possible support and minimise opposition �– such as: Sea Terminals, Rail Station, City Centre to Hospital Parkway and Newtown �– keep it as a core line 1, with lots of potential for extensions to new constituencies in future �– sell it as something that will help the motorist.

Make the primary criterion of success high ridership �– it has to be convenient, popular and seen as a success �– forget about the economics �– make it about transit-oriented development, affordability and integration with the rest of the PT system �– it needs to be free if another PT ticket is purchased, services must be very frequent, fast, high quality, reliable and interchange needs to be seamless. It may take a change of government to implement, but make sure the project is ready to fast-track when the planets are aligned.

Resist pressure to compromise service quality (frequency, speed, ride quality, capacity, etc) to reduce build costs. Learn from similar projects overseas - for a given budget, it is better to build a shorter line to a higher standard than a longer line to a lower standard. For example, set a goal that MRT vehicles can travel at 50 kph - non-stop - between stations. If the first line is a success, you will get money to extend it.

In NZ implementation speed is a critical factor. Starting actually building something inside 3 years should be your priority.

Revisions to discount rates for cost–benefit analysis help planners take a longer term view of infrastructure project business cases. The new rules mean on-street light rail (capacity 3000–9000 passengers per hour) becomes more cost-effective than a 2-lane busway (capacity 2000–5000 passengers per hour) for the N–S corridor.

Page last modified 03 April 2026 at 11:50 AM