FITWellington.MRTTalkingPoints2026 History
Show minor edits - Show changes to output
Added lines 3-4:
(:title Mass Rapid Transit Talking Points 2026:)
Changed line 10 from:
Don't be too ambitious to start with -- make the first MRT line something that will rally the maximum possible support and minimise opposition -- such as: Ferry Terminals, Rail Station, City Centre to Hospital Parkway and Newtown -- keep it as a core (busy all day, every day) line 1, with lots of potential for extensions to new constituencies in future -- sell it as something that will help the motorist.
to:
Don't be too ambitious to start with -- make the first MRT (mass rapid transit) line something that will rally the maximum possible support and minimise opposition -- such as: Ferry Terminals, Rail Station, City Centre to Hospital Parkway and Newtown -- keep it as a core (busy all day, every day) line 1, with lots of potential for extensions to new constituencies in future -- sell it as something that will help the motorist.
Changed line 5 from:
to:
Added line 8:
Changed lines 11-12 from:
Make ''high ridership'' the primary criterion of success -- it has to be convenient, popular and seen as a success -- forget about the economics -- make it about transit-oriented development, affordability and integration with the rest of the PT system -- it needs to be free if another PT ticket is purchased, services must be very frequent, fast, high quality, reliable and interchange needs to be seamless. It may take a change of government to implement, but make sure the project is ready to fast-track when the planets are aligned.
to:
{=Be useful to many people=}
Make ''high ridership'' the primary criterion of success -- it has to be accessible, popular and seen as a success -- forget about the economics -- make it about transit-oriented development, affordability and integration with the rest of the PT system -- it needs to be free if another PT ticket is purchased, services must be very frequent, fast, high quality, reliable, and interchange needs to be seamless. It may take a change of government to implement, but make sure the project is ready to fast-track when the planets are aligned.
{=Set quality standards=}
Changed line 17 from:
{=Scalable across decades=}
to:
Added line 20:
{=Find people who deliver=}
Added lines 1-13:
Meeting with Greater Wellington March 2026
First, well done, keep going and don't give up – there are genuine affordable modal alternatives between the car and heavy rail – buses are essential and will always be needed but they (alone) can never fill the "missing mode" gap.
Don't be too ambitious to start with - make the first MRT line something that will rally the maximum possible support and minimise opposition – such as: Sea Terminals, Rail Station, City Centre to Hospital Parkway and Newtown – keep it as a core line 1, with lots of potential for extensions to new constituencies in future – sell it as something that will help the motorist.
Make the primary criterion of success high ridership – it has to be convenient, popular and seen as a success – forget about the economics – make it about transit-oriented development, affordability and integration with the rest of the PT system – it needs to be free if another PT ticket is purchased, services must be very frequent, fast, high quality, reliable and interchange needs to be seamless. It may take a change of government to implement, but make sure the project is ready to fast-track when the planets are aligned.
Resist pressure to compromise service quality (frequency, speed, ride quality, capacity, etc) to reduce build costs. Learn from similar projects overseas - for a given budget, it is better to build a shorter line to a higher standard than a longer line to a lower standard. For example, set a goal that MRT vehicles can travel at 50 kph - non-stop - between stations. If the first line is a success, you will get money to extend it.
In NZ implementation speed is a critical factor. Starting actually building something inside 3 years should be your priority.
Revisions to discount rates for cost`-benefit analysis help planners take a longer term view of infrastructure project business cases. The new rules mean on-street light rail (capacity 3000-9000 passengers per hour) becomes more cost-effective than a 2-lane busway (capacity 2000-5000 passengers per hour) for the N`-S corridor.