Recent Changes
Recent Changes · Search:

FITWellington.​ThreeMinuteSummary History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to markup

08 September 2015 at 05:35 PM by John Rankin - fix width of images
Changed lines 23-24 from:
Light rail route and options
to:
Light rail route and options
Changed line 29 from:
Inner city map
to:
Inner city map
08 September 2015 at 02:10 PM by John Rankin - tweak presentation
Changed lines 5-6 from:

(:typeset-page parasep=space :)

to:

(:typeset-page parasep=space fontset=kepler subtitle="Briefing to Decision Makers" :)

Changed lines 9-10 from:
  • We comprise engineers, scientists, policy analysts and climate & health professionals with community walking & cycling advocates.
to:
  • We comprise engineers, scientists, policy analysts and climate & health professionals, with community walking & cycling advocates.
Changed lines 15-16 from:
  • John Milford of the Wellington Employers’ Chamber of Commerce says, “We need to get together to sort it out.” Ready when you are, John.
to:
  • John Milford of the Wellington Employers’ Chamber of Commerce says, “We need to get together to sort it out.” We’re ready when you are.
Changed lines 19-20 from:
  • Our research shows that BRT as presently configured for Wellington does not qualify as such according to internationally-agreed BRT criteria—neither will it be rapid nor provide the capacity required .
to:
  • Our research shows that BRT as presently configured for Wellington does not qualify as such according to internationally-agreed BRT criteria—neither will it be rapid nor provide the capacity required.
Changed lines 31-33 from:
  • We agree that the currently-planned GW incremental bus improvements should go ahead as a temporary measure…
  • But we believe climate change and looming fossil fuel shortages require a paradigm shift.
to:
  • We agree that the currently-planned GW incremental bus improvements should go ahead as an interim measure…
  • But we believe climate change and the shift away from fossil fuels require a paradigm shift.
08 September 2015 at 01:42 PM by John Rankin - fix invalid characters
Changed lines 5-6 from:
  • I represent FIT Wellington—Fair, Intelligent, Transport. Why ‘Fair’? Because we believe the spine study unfairly side-lined light rail with inflated costs. Why ‘Intelligent’? Because bulldozing a route through Mt Victoria and the unpopulated town belt is not intelligent: it will not fulfil the excellent aims of the spine study “to produce a high quality, modern public transport system for the Greater Wellington region”
to:

(:typeset-page parasep=space :)

  • I represent FIT Wellington—Fair, Intelligent, Transport. Why ‘Fair’? Because we believe the spine study unfairly side-lined light rail with inflated costs. Why ‘Intelligent’? Because bulldozing a route through Mt Victoria and the unpopulated town belt is not intelligent: it will not fulfil the excellent aims of the spine study, “to produce a high quality, modern public transport system for the Greater Wellington region.”
Changed line 21 from:
  • Here are route options which are credible, affordable and consistent with LRT best-practice world-wide. You have copies. I won’t go into detail: we did that in a very productive meeting with Greg Campbell and Wayne Hastie on Sunday, 6 September 2015. The map should be viewed with the explanatory text and costings sent to Greg: we ask that he send it to all members of your committee.1
to:
  • Here are route options which are credible, affordable and consistent with LRT best-practice world-wide. You have copies. I won’t go into detail: we did that in a very productive meeting with Greg Campbell and Wayne Hastie on Monday, 7 September 2015. The map should be viewed with the explanatory text and costings sent to Greg: we ask that he send it to all members of your committee.2
08 September 2015 at 01:38 PM by John Rankin - add link to proposal
Changed lines 19-20 from:
  • Here are route options which are credible, affordable and consistent with LRT best-practice world-wide. You have copies. I won’t go into detail: we did that in a very productive meeting with Greg Campbell and Wayne Hastie on Sunday, 6 September 2015. The map should be viewed with the explanatory text and costings sent to Greg: we ask that he send it to all members of your committee.
to:
  • Here are route options which are credible, affordable and consistent with LRT best-practice world-wide. You have copies. I won’t go into detail: we did that in a very productive meeting with Greg Campbell and Wayne Hastie on Sunday, 6 September 2015. The map should be viewed with the explanatory text and costings sent to Greg: we ask that he send it to all members of your committee.3
Changed lines 33-34 from:
  • We need high capacity, all-electric public transport. It should be urgently planned for now
to:
  • We need high capacity, all-electric public transport. It should be urgently planned for now.
Added lines 38-40:
08 September 2015 at 01:34 PM by John Rankin - add image alt text
Changed lines 11-12 from:
  • Jenny Chetwynd post-flyover says “so it’s about going back to the community & taking a fresh approach.” Here we are, and here’s a fresh approach.
to:
  • Jenny Chetwynd post-flyover says, “So it’s about going back to the community & taking a fresh approach.” Here we are, and here’s a fresh approach.
Changed lines 21-22 from:
to:
Light rail route and options
Changed line 27 from:
to:
Inner city map
08 September 2015 at 01:31 PM by John Rankin - draft pitch
Added lines 1-37:

FIT/Generation Zero Presentation to GW RLTC meeting on item 7 on the agenda (BRT business plan): 10am Tuesday, 8 September 2015 at GW

FIT/Generation Zero Presentation to GW Sustainable Transport Committee meeting on part 3 of item 4 on the agenda (General Managers’ Report, Regional Transport Planning, BRT business case update): 9:30am Wednesday, 9 September 2015 at GW

  • I represent FIT Wellington—Fair, Intelligent, Transport. Why ‘Fair’? Because we believe the spine study unfairly side-lined light rail with inflated costs. Why ‘Intelligent’? Because bulldozing a route through Mt Victoria and the unpopulated town belt is not intelligent: it will not fulfil the excellent aims of the spine study “to produce a high quality, modern public transport system for the Greater Wellington region”
  • We comprise engineers, scientists, policy analysts and climate & health professionals with community walking & cycling advocates.
  • We present alongside Generation Zero: their generation will inherit plans made now.
  • Jenny Chetwynd post-flyover says “so it’s about going back to the community & taking a fresh approach.” Here we are, and here’s a fresh approach.
  • John Milford of the Wellington Employers’ Chamber of Commerce says, “We need to get together to sort it out.” Ready when you are, John.
  • Our solution for the Basin Reserve is simple. Our route will bypass and help decongest it.
  • Our research shows that BRT as presently configured for Wellington does not qualify as such according to internationally-agreed BRT criteria—neither will it be rapid nor provide the capacity required .
  • Here are route options which are credible, affordable and consistent with LRT best-practice world-wide. You have copies. I won’t go into detail: we did that in a very productive meeting with Greg Campbell and Wayne Hastie on Sunday, 6 September 2015. The map should be viewed with the explanatory text and costings sent to Greg: we ask that he send it to all members of your committee.
  • The route options are not the only possible: they are there for discussion.
  • We prefer a route along the whole of Lambton Quay if technically possible.
  • We agree that the currently-planned GW incremental bus improvements should go ahead as a temporary measure…
  • But we believe climate change and looming fossil fuel shortages require a paradigm shift.
  • We need high capacity, all-electric public transport. It should be urgently planned for now
  • If we start today, Wellington could have a world-class light rail tram service between the Railway Station and the Airport, via the Hospital, by 2030: this for an estimated cost as low as $450 million.
  • We are happy to enter discussions with all decision-makers and welcome questions now.
Page last modified 08 September 2015 at 05:35 PM